landfill: be bad for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for animals 1.00
be for animals 0.94
be important to animals 0.91
affect animals 0.88
be important to animals living 0.86
affect plants animals everyday 0.82
affect animals everyday 0.82
affect animal life in area 0.81
be important to animals living in pond 0.80
be bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living in pond)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(water plant, be important to animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(water plant, be important to animals living)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living in pond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(water plant, be important to animals living in pond)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(landfill, affect animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(landfill, affect animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animals)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(water plant, be important to animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(water plant, be important to animals living)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(water plant, be important to animals living in pond)