landfill: contribute to global warming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to global warming 1.00
contribute to warming 0.94
stop global warming 0.92
stop warming 0.84
affect global environment 0.80
affect climate change 0.78
contribute to pollution 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(recycling, stop global warming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect climate change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(recycling, stop global warming)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(recycling, stop global warming)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(recycling, affect climate change)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect climate change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(landfill, contribute to global warming)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(landfill, contribute to warming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(landfill, contribute to warming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(landfill, affect global environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(landfill, contribute to warming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect global environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(landfill, affect global environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to warming)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect global environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(landfill, contribute to global warming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(recycling, stop global warming)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(recycling, affect climate change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(landfill, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)