landfill: is environmental issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is environmental issue 1.00
is significant environmental issue 0.95
is environmental 0.92
is issue 0.83
is significant issue 0.79
be considered threat to ecological security 0.78
threat to ecological security 0.78
cause pollution 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(landfill, is environmental issue)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is significant environmental issue)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(landfill, is environmental)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is significant issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(landfill, is environmental)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(landfill, cause pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(landfill, is environmental)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(landfill, is significant environmental issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(landfill, cause pollution)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(landfill, is significant issue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(landfill, cause pollution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(landfill, is significant environmental issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(landfill, cause pollution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(landfill, is significant issue)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(landfill, is significant environmental issue)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(landfill, is significant issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(landfill, is environmental issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)