landfill: is sustainable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sustainable 1.00
is sustainable future 0.94
be necessary for sustainable development 0.92
be viable economic model 0.78
is unsustainable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, be viable economic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(landfill, is sustainable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, be viable economic model)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(source, be viable economic model)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable future)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, be viable economic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(landfill, is sustainable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(recycling, is sustainable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(recycling, is sustainable future)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(landfill, is sustainable)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is unsustainable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(landfill, is unsustainable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(landfill, is unsustainable)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(landfill, is unsustainable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(landfill, is sustainable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(source, be viable economic model)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(recycling, is sustainable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(recycling, is sustainable future)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(source, be viable economic model)