recycling: is sustainable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sustainable 1.00
is sustainable future 0.94
be necessary for sustainable development 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(landfill, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(landfill, is sustainable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(recycling, is sustainable)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(recycling, is sustainable future)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(recycling, is sustainable future)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable future)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(recycling, is sustainable future)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(recycling, is sustainable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(landfill, is sustainable)