landfill: smell bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
smell bad 1.00
smell 0.95
smell like horse shit 0.82
be bad 0.80
is stinky 0.80
stink 0.79
be bad thing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(construction site, smell like horse shit)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(construction site, is stinky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(construction site, smell like horse shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(construction site, smell like horse shit)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(construction site, is stinky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(construction site, is stinky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(landfill, smell bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(landfill, smell)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(landfill, stink)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(landfill, stink)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(landfill, stink)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(landfill, stink)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, smell bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(construction site, smell like horse shit)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(construction site, is stinky)