landfill: be bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad thing 1.00
be good thing 0.96
be thing 0.93
is thing 0.93
be bad 0.88
is good idea 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
smell bad 0.78
feel like better game 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(recycling, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is good idea)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(recycling, is good idea)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(recycling, is good idea)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(recycling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(recycling, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(landfill, be thing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(landfill, be thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(landfill, be thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, be good thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(landfill, be good thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(landfill, smell bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landfill, smell bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(landfill, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(landfill, smell bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, smell bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(recycling, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(recycling, is good idea)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)