landfill: be good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good thing 1.00
be bad thing 0.96
be thing 0.95
is thing 0.94
is good idea 0.85
feel like better game 0.81
be bad 0.80
be good for environment 0.79
be important to us 0.78
feel like game 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, be good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is good idea)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(recycling, is good idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(recycling, is good idea)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(landfill, be good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(landfill, be thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(landfill, be thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(landfill, be thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(landfill, be good for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(landfill, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, be good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(recycling, is good idea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(landfill, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)