landfill: be thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be thing 1.00
is thing 0.99
be good thing 0.95
be bad thing 0.93
is good idea 0.79
is idea 0.76
be in sport important to us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(landfill, be thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is good idea)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is idea)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(landfill, be thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(recycling, is idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(recycling, is idea)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(recycling, is good idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(recycling, is good idea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(landfill, be thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good thing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(landfill, be good thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, be good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(landfill, be thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, is idea)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(recycling, is good idea)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(landfill, be thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)