landfill: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad 0.86
has quality worth 0.82
has quality cost 0.81
has quality full 0.80
has quality evil 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad thing 0.79
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(recycling, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recycling, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(water plant, has quality cost)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(water plant, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(recycling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(recycling, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(recycling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(recycling, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(water plant, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(water plant, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(water plant, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(water plant, has quality cost)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(landfill, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(landfill, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality full)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality full)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality full)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(landfill, has quality full)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(landfill, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(landfill, be good for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad thing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(recycling, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(recycling, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(water plant, has quality cost)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(water plant, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)