landfill: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality full 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
be good for environment 0.80
has quality evil 0.78
be good thing 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(recycling, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(recycling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(recycling, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(recycling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(recycling, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(water plant, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(water plant, has quality worth)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(landfill, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(landfill, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(landfill, has quality full)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(recycling, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(landfill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)