landlord: need guarantor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, company
Weight: 0.62
, home owner
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tenant
Weight: 0.37
, homeless person
Weight: 0.35
, elderly person
Weight: 0.34
, pet owner
Weight: 0.34
, neighbor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need guarantor 1.00
ask for guarantor 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need guarantor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tenant, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tenant, need guarantor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(landlord, need guarantor)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landlord, ask for guarantor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(landlord, ask for guarantor)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(landlord, ask for guarantor)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(landlord, ask for guarantor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(landlord, need guarantor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(landlord, need guarantor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(landlord, need guarantor)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tenant, need guarantor)