tenant: need guarantor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings renter
Weight: 0.47
, landlord
Weight: 0.37
, buyer
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, one person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need guarantor 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(landlord, need guarantor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tenant, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(landlord, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(landlord, need guarantor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tenant, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tenant, need guarantor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tenant, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tenant, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need guarantor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tenant, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tenant, need guarantor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need guarantor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(landlord, need guarantor)