language: develop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop 1.00
promote development 0.82
be developed 0.81
evolve 0.79
was developed 0.77
affect development 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sign language, was developed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(language, develop)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(programming language, be developed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(language, develop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(programming language, be developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sign language, was developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(programming language, be developed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(language, develop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sign language, was developed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(language, develop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(language, develop)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(language, evolve)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, evolve)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(language, was developed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(language, evolve)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(language, evolve)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(language, was developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(language, was developed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(language, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(language, develop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(language, develop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be developed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be developed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(language, develop)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)