sign language: was developed

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.64 , activity Weight: 0.63 , expression Weight: 0.63 , language Weight: 0.63
Siblings	american sign language Weight: 0.91 , dialect Weight: 0.58 , english language Weight: 0.41 , programming language Weight: 0.41 , chinese language Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was developed	1.00
was created	0.83
was invented	0.81
was introduced	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(language, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(language, was developed)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(language, was created)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(language, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(language, was invented)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(language, was developed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(language, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(american sign language, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(sign language, was developed)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(language, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(sign language, was developed)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(sign language, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(american sign language, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(american sign language, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(sign language, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(sign language, was created)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(sign language, was introduced)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was created)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was invented)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(sign language, was created)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was introduced)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(sign language, was introduced)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(sign language, was created)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(sign language, was introduced)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(sign language, was invented)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(sign language, was invented)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(sign language, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(language, was created)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(language, was developed)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(language, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(american sign language, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(language, was developed)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(language, was created)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(language, was invented)