language: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality change 0.86
has quality system 0.82
has quality variety 0.78
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(english language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sign language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sign language, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(english language, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sign language, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(english language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sign language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(language, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sign language, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sign language, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)