programming language: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	language Weight: 0.81 , syntax Weight: 0.67 , computer science Weight: 0.67 , topic Weight: 0.64
Siblings	source code Weight: 0.69 , smalltalk Weight: 0.68 , perl Weight: 0.68 , lisp Weight: 0.67 , basic Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality right	0.88
has quality change	0.86
has quality system	0.82
have bad reputation	0.81
is bad thing	0.79
has quality variety	0.78
is good major	0.76
has quality sin	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(computer science, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(computer science, is good major)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is good major)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(lisp, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(perl, have bad reputation)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(perl, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality right)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(computer science, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(basic, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(basic, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(perl, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(perl, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(lisp, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(lisp, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(basic, has quality right) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(basic, has quality right)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(perl, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(perl, have bad reputation)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(basic, is bad thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(basic, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(programming language, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(computer science, is good major)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(basic, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(lisp, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(perl, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(basic, has quality right)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(perl, have bad reputation)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(basic, is bad thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(computer science, is good major)