source code: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents source
Weight: 0.69
, software
Weight: 0.69
, programming language
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.68
Siblings javascript
Weight: 0.60
, asp
Weight: 0.58
, compiler
Weight: 0.55
, gpl
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is great 0.81
needs quality product 0.80
is quality product 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
has quality asset 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(software, needs quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(software, needs quality product)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(software, needs quality product)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(javascript, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(javascript, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(compiler, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(software, needs quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(javascript, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(javascript, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(compiler, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(compiler, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(javascript, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(javascript, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(javascript, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(javascript, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(source code, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(source code, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(compiler, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(javascript, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(source code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)