large: eat small fish

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.50
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, term
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.47
Siblings small
Weight: 0.32
, mammoth
Weight: 0.31
, brown bear
Weight: 0.30
, giant panda
Weight: 0.30
, giant
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat small fish 1.00
eat fish 0.96
eat 0.84
be big or small 0.78
eat spaghetti 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(animal, eat fish)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(large, eat small fish)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(large, eat small fish)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(large, eat small fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(animal, eat fish)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be big or small)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat fish)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(animal, be big or small)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(animal, eat fish)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(large, eat small fish)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(large, eat small fish)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(large, eat small fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mammoth, eat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mammoth, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(large, eat small fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(large, eat small fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, eat fish)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mammoth, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, eat fish)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(large, eat small fish)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small)