large: were extended families important in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.50
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, option
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.48
Siblings small
Weight: 0.32
, mammoth
Weight: 0.31
, size
Weight: 0.31
, brown bear
Weight: 0.30
, sea lion
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
were extended families important in china 1.00
were extended families important in ancient china 0.96
were extended families important 0.94
were families important in china 0.93
were extended families 0.93
were families important in ancient china 0.89
were families important 0.86
were families 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(large, were extended families important in china)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(large, were extended families important in ancient china)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(large, were extended families important in ancient china)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(large, were extended families important)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(large, were extended families important)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(large, were families important in china)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(large, were extended families important in ancient china)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(large, were extended families)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(large, were families important in china)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(large, were extended families)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(large, were extended families important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(large, were families important in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(large, were extended families)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(large, were families important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(large, were families important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(large, were families)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(large, were families)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(large, were families important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(large, were families)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families important in ancient china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(large, were families important in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(large, were families)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(large, were families important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(large, were extended families important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(large, were extended families important in china)