lateral: raises hurt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.48
, direction
Weight: 0.41
, facility
Weight: 0.41
, approach
Weight: 0.39
Siblings helix
Weight: 0.30
, stair
Weight: 0.30
, spline
Weight: 0.30
, arch
Weight: 0.30
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
raises hurt 1.00
raises 0.95
hurt 0.80
supports hurt 0.78
hurt bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(arch, supports hurt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(arch, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(arch, hurt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(arch, supports hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(arch, supports hurt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(lateral, raises hurt)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(lateral, raises)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lateral, raises)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(lateral, raises)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lateral, raises hurt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arch, hurt bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(arch, hurt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lateral, raises hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arch, supports hurt)