laugh: be in serious situations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sound
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, fun
Weight: 0.54
, laughter
Weight: 0.49
Siblings laughing
Weight: 0.37
, joke
Weight: 0.35
, smile
Weight: 0.34
, remember
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in serious situations 1.00
be in bad situations 0.92
be in uncomfortable situations 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(smile, be in bad situations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(smile, be in bad situations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(smile, be in bad situations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(laugh, be in serious situations)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(laugh, be in bad situations)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laugh, be in bad situations)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laugh, be in bad situations)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(laugh, be in uncomfortable situations)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laugh, be in uncomfortable situations)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laugh, be in uncomfortable situations)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laugh, be in bad situations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laugh, be in uncomfortable situations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laugh, be in serious situations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(laugh, be in serious situations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laugh, be in serious situations)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smile, be in bad situations)