laughter: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents joke
Weight: 0.64
, emotion
Weight: 0.61
, sound
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, expression
Weight: 0.57
Siblings laugh
Weight: 0.49
, laughing
Weight: 0.35
, joy
Weight: 0.34
, applause
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is great 0.81
feel good 0.80
be good for us 0.80
has quality function 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(emotion, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expression, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(emotion, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(emotion, feel good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(expression, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(laughing, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laughter, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laughter, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(emotion, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laughter, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(laughing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(laughing, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(laughing, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(laughing, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(laughter, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laughter, be good for us)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(laughter, be good for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laughter, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(laughter, is great)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality function)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(emotion, feel good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(laughing, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(laughing, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(laughter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(emotion, feel good)