laughter: qualify as function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents joke
Weight: 0.64
, emotion
Weight: 0.61
, sound
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, expression
Weight: 0.57
Siblings laugh
Weight: 0.49
, laughing
Weight: 0.35
, joy
Weight: 0.34
, applause
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
qualify as function 1.00
qualify as biological function 0.89
has quality function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(laughter, qualify as function)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laughter, qualify as biological function)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(laughter, qualify as biological function)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(laughter, qualify as biological function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(laughter, qualify as biological function)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(laughter, has quality function)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(laughter, qualify as function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(laughter, qualify as function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(laughter, qualify as function)