laundry: be expensive in hotels

Related concepts

Parents	service Weight: 0.63 , need Weight: 0.62 , necessity Weight: 0.61 , facility Weight: 0.59 , activity Weight: 0.59
Siblings	clean clothes Weight: 0.56 , housework Weight: 0.33 , cleaning Weight: 0.33 , postal service Weight: 0.33 , escort service Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive in hotels	1.00
be in restaurants	0.80
is expensive	0.77
be in restaurants poor	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(facility, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(necessity, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(necessity, is expensive)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(necessity, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(facility, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(necessity, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(cleaning, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(cleaning, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

Similarity expansion

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(laundry, is expensive)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(laundry, is expensive)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(laundry, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(necessity, is expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(cleaning, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(necessity, is expensive)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)