laundry: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.63
, need
Weight: 0.62
, necessity
Weight: 0.61
, facility
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings clean clothes
Weight: 0.56
, housework
Weight: 0.33
, cleaning
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be more expensive for less 0.86
be more expensive for less now 0.85
is damn expensive 0.84
be cheaper in countries 0.78
be expensive in hotels 0.77
be cheaper in poor countries 0.77
need cost 0.76
be based costing better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laundry, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(necessity, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laundry, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laundry, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(necessity, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(necessity, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is damn expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(necessity, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(laundry, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cleaning, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cleaning, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is damn expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(laundry, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(laundry, be expensive in hotels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laundry, be expensive in hotels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laundry, be expensive in hotels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(laundry, be expensive in hotels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laundry, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(necessity, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cleaning, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cleaning, is damn expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(necessity, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(laundry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be cheaper in poor countries)