law firm: be with multiple partners

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accounting firm
Weight: 0.75
, partner
Weight: 0.68
, business
Weight: 0.68
, firm
Weight: 0.61
Siblings company
Weight: 0.68
, lobbyist
Weight: 0.53
, software company
Weight: 0.36
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with multiple partners 1.00
have partners 0.91
is partners 0.90
is partnerships 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(law firm, be with multiple partners)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(law firm, be with multiple partners)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(law firm, be with multiple partners)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(law firm, is partnerships)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law firm, have partners)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(law firm, is partnerships)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(law firm, is partners)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(law firm, have partners)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be with multiple partners)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(law firm, be with multiple partners)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(law firm, be with multiple partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is partnerships)