law firm: have partners

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accounting firm
Weight: 0.75
, partner
Weight: 0.68
, business
Weight: 0.68
, firm
Weight: 0.61
Siblings company
Weight: 0.68
, lobbyist
Weight: 0.53
, software company
Weight: 0.36
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have partners 1.00
is partners 0.99
be with multiple partners 0.91
is partnerships 0.79
use partnership model 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law firm, have partners)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(law firm, have partners)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(law firm, have partners)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(law firm, be with multiple partners)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(law firm, is partners)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(law firm, is partners)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be with multiple partners)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(law firm, be with multiple partners)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have partners)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law firm, have partners)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(law firm, have partners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is partnerships)