law: protect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prohibition
Weight: 0.74
, mandate
Weight: 0.68
, amendment
Weight: 0.68
, principle
Weight: 0.66
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.77
, ordinance
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.66
, freedom
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect 1.00
protect people 0.94
be made for protection 0.80
preserve rights 0.79
protect rivers 0.79
protect hate speech 0.79
preserve individual rights 0.77
be made for protection of animals 0.77
protect intellectual property 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(law, protect)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(law, protect)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(amendment, protect hate speech)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(law, protect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(amendment, preserve individual rights)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(amendment, preserve rights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(law, protect)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(amendment, protect hate speech)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(law, protect)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(law, protect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(law, protect)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(law, protect people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(law, protect people)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(law, protect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(law, protect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve rights)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve individual rights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve rights)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(law, protect)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve individual rights)