law: protect people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prohibition
Weight: 0.74
, mandate
Weight: 0.68
, amendment
Weight: 0.68
, principle
Weight: 0.66
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.77
, ordinance
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.66
, freedom
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect people 1.00
protect 0.94
protect rivers 0.80
protect hate speech 0.79
be made for protection of animals 0.79
be made for protection 0.77
affect people 0.77
preserve rights 0.77
preserve individual rights 0.77
be important to people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(law, protect people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(law, protect people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(amendment, affect people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(law, protect people)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(amendment, protect hate speech)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(law, protect people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(amendment, affect people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(amendment, preserve individual rights)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(amendment, preserve rights)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(amendment, affect people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(law, protect people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(law, protect people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(amendment, affect people)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(law, protect people)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(amendment, protect hate speech)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(law, protect people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(law, protect people)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(law, protect)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(law, protect)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(law, protect)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(law, protect)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(law, affect people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(law, affect people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(law, be important to people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(law, be important to people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(law, affect people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(law, be important to people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law, affect people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(law, be important to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(law, protect people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(amendment, affect people)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve rights)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve individual rights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, protect hate speech)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(amendment, affect people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve rights)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(law, protect people)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve individual rights)