lawyer: charge fee for their service

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge fee for their service 1.00
charge money 0.83
face charge 0.79
advertise their service 0.77
clear him of all charge 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defendant, face charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge fee for their service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(defendant, face charge)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defendant, face charge)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, advertise their service)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defendant, face charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(solicitor, advertise their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(solicitor, advertise their service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lawyer, charge fee for their service)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lawyer, clear him of all charge)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lawyer, clear him of all charge)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lawyer, clear him of all charge)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lawyer, charge money)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, clear him of all charge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge fee for their service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defendant, face charge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(solicitor, advertise their service)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(lawyer, charge fee for their service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defendant, face charge)