lawyer: charge money

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge money 1.00
face charge 0.83
charge fee for their service 0.83
press charge 0.81
clear him of all charge 0.80
clear defendant of all charge 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defendant, face charge)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(defendant, face charge)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defendant, face charge)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(judge, clear defendant of all charge)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(defendant, face charge)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lawyer, charge money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(judge, clear defendant of all charge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lawyer, charge money)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lawyer, charge fee for their service)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lawyer, clear him of all charge)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, press charge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lawyer, clear him of all charge)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lawyer, charge fee for their service)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lawyer, press charge)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge fee for their service)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lawyer, press charge)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, clear him of all charge)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lawyer, clear him of all charge)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge fee for their service)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, press charge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, charge money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defendant, face charge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(judge, clear defendant of all charge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, charge money)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defendant, face charge)