lawyer: defend guilty people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend guilty people 1.00
defend guilty 0.98
defend gulity people 0.92
plead guilty 0.86
defend people 0.85
is wrongfully convicted 0.80
is convicted 0.79
defend murderers 0.77
defend criminals 0.76
defend killers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(defendant, is wrongfully convicted)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(defendant, plead guilty)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(defendant, is convicted)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(defendant, plead guilty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(defendant, is convicted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(defendant, is wrongfully convicted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(defendant, plead guilty)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(defendant, is wrongfully convicted)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(defendant, is convicted)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barrister, defend guilty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(defendant, plead guilty)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(defendant, is wrongfully convicted)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(defendant, is convicted)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(barrister, defend guilty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(barrister, defend guilty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend guilty people)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(defendant, plead guilty)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(defendant, is convicted)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(defendant, is wrongfully convicted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(barrister, defend guilty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(defendant, plead guilty)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(defendant, is wrongfully convicted)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(defendant, is convicted)