lawyer: defend people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend people 1.00
defend guilty people 0.85
defend gulity people 0.85
defend criminals 0.84
defend guilty 0.81
defend murderers 0.81
defend killers 0.81
ever defend mass murderers 0.79
defend obvious murderers 0.78
find people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barrister, defend guilty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(barrister, defend guilty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(barrister, defend guilty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend people)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend guilty people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend guilty people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend guilty people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend guilty people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(barrister, defend guilty)