lawyer: defend his client

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend his client 1.00
prove his client innocent 0.86
keep client inform 0.83
has defend probably quilty person 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend his client)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend his client)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, defend his client)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend his client)