lawyer: prove his client innocent

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
prove his client innocent 1.00
defend his client 0.86
prove that person be guilty 0.82
prove their case 0.81
keep client inform 0.81
prove case 0.80
prove to judge 0.77
clear defendant of all charge 0.76
has great power over convict criminal 0.76
has defend probably quilty person 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(judge, has great power over convict criminal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(judge, clear defendant of all charge)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(judge, has great power over convict criminal)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(judge, has great power over convict criminal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove their case)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove case)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend his client)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend his client)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend his client)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove their case)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove case)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove case)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove their case)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend his client)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(lawyer, keep client inform)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove case)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove their case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(judge, has great power over convict criminal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(judge, clear defendant of all charge)