lawyer: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
be paid 0.97
is paid 0.96
get paid more 0.96
get paid money 0.94
get paid little 0.93
get paid week 0.92
is paid less 0.89
get paid big $ 0.89
be paid more than engineers 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(specialist, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(specialist, is paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid more)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid less)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid more)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid less)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barrister, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(specialist, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(specialist, is paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(barrister, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(barrister, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lawyer, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lawyer, be paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, be paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid less)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid more)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(barrister, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid more)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid less)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)