specialist: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.67
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.56
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.56
, doctor
Weight: 0.53
Siblings computer scientist
Weight: 0.70
, psychologist
Weight: 0.68
, physician
Weight: 0.66
, lawyer
Weight: 0.66
, gynecologist
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid more 0.96
is paid less 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(doctor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(doctor, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(doctor, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(physician, is paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(doctor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(physician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(physician, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialist, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid less)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid more)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialist, get paid more)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialist, is paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid more)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(specialist, is paid less)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid less)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid less)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(doctor, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(physician, is paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(doctor, get paid)