lawyer: wear wigs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear wigs 1.00
wear white wigs 0.98
wigs 0.96
use wigs 0.96
wear wigs in court 0.94
wear wigs uk 0.92
be in uk wear wigs 0.92
be in britain wear wigs 0.92
wear wigs in england 0.91
be in england wear wigs 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wigs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear white wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs in court)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs uk)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(barrister, be in uk wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(barrister, wigs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(barrister, wigs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear wigs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(barrister, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(barrister, be in uk wear wigs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs uk)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear wigs uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear wigs in court)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(barrister, wear white wigs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear white wigs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear wigs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lawyer, be in britain wear wigs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be in britain wear wigs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be in britain wear wigs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be in uk wear wigs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lawyer, be in uk wear wigs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be in uk wear wigs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs in england)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear wigs in england)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs in england)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(lawyer, be in britain wear wigs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(lawyer, be in uk wear wigs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear wigs in england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(barrister, wear wigs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(barrister, wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(barrister, wear white wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(barrister, wear wigs in court)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(barrister, be in uk wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(barrister, wear wigs uk)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)