laziness: be related to evolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.66
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, sin
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.37
, gluttony
Weight: 0.35
, ignorance
Weight: 0.35
, boredom
Weight: 0.35
, dishonesty
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to evolution 1.00
be related to human evolution 0.95
be unimportant in process of evolution 0.83
is related 0.78
be related 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(virtue, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to evolution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(virtue, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trait, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(virtue, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(trait, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(virtue, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(laziness, be related to evolution)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to evolution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(virtue, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trait, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(virtue, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(laziness, be related to evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trait, be related)