laziness: be related to human evolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.66
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, sin
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.37
, gluttony
Weight: 0.35
, ignorance
Weight: 0.35
, boredom
Weight: 0.35
, dishonesty
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to human evolution 1.00
be related to evolution 0.95
is human 0.85
be unimportant in process of evolution 0.83
be part of human psychology 0.78
is human trait 0.78
is related 0.77
be related 0.76
is important biology 0.76
be used in defining of species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(trait, is important biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be used in defining of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(virtue, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(virtue, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trait, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trait, be used in defining of species)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(trait, is important biology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(trait, is important biology)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(virtue, be related)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(trait, be used in defining of species)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(trait, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(trait, is important biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be used in defining of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(virtue, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boredom, be part of human psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is human)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(laziness, is human trait)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(laziness, is human)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(laziness, is human trait)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(laziness, be related to evolution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(laziness, is human)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(laziness, is human trait)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(virtue, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trait, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(trait, be used in defining of species)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(trait, is important biology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(virtue, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trait, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(trait, be used in defining of species)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(trait, is important biology)