laziness: is human

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.66
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, sin
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.37
, gluttony
Weight: 0.35
, ignorance
Weight: 0.35
, boredom
Weight: 0.35
, dishonesty
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is human 1.00
is human trait 0.85
be related to human evolution 0.85
be part of human psychology 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boredom, be part of human psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(laziness, is human)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(laziness, is human trait)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(laziness, is human trait)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(laziness, is human trait)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is human)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boredom, be part of human psychology)