laziness: is evolved trait

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.66
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, sin
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.37
, gluttony
Weight: 0.35
, ignorance
Weight: 0.35
, boredom
Weight: 0.35
, dishonesty
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is evolved trait 1.00
is evolved 0.91
be evolved 0.91
has trait trait 0.86
is human trait 0.84
has trait fun 0.83
be considered personality trait 0.81
be considered bad personality trait 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(trait, be evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is evolved trait)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sin, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is evolved trait)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sin, has trait fun)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(trait, be evolved)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sin, has trait fun)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(trait, be evolved)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(trait, be evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sin, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(laziness, is evolved trait)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is evolved)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, has trait trait)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(laziness, is human trait)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(laziness, is evolved)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has trait trait)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(laziness, is evolved)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(laziness, is human trait)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(laziness, has trait trait)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(laziness, has trait trait)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(laziness, is human trait)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(laziness, is evolved)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is evolved trait)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(trait, be evolved)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sin, has trait fun)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(trait, be evolved)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(laziness, is evolved trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sin, has trait fun)