lcd: work on atomic level

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.60
, electronic device
Weight: 0.59
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings tablet computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, pda
Weight: 0.35
, vcr
Weight: 0.34
, motherboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
work on atomic level 1.00
work on atomic molecular level 0.92
work on level 0.80
work on molecular level 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(lcd, work on atomic level)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on atomic molecular level)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(lcd, work on atomic molecular level)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lcd, work on level)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lcd, work on atomic molecular level)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on atomic molecular level)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on level)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lcd, work on molecular level)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on molecular level)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(lcd, work on level)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on molecular level)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lcd, work on molecular level)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on atomic level)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lcd, work on atomic level)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lcd, work on atomic level)