lcd: work on level

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.60
, electronic device
Weight: 0.59
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings tablet computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, pda
Weight: 0.35
, vcr
Weight: 0.34
, motherboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
work on level 1.00
work on atomic level 0.80
work 0.79
work on molecular level 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(technology, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lcd, work on level)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lcd, work on level)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(application, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lcd, work on level)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(application, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(function, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(technology, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(technology, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(function, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(application, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(technology, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on level)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on level)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(application, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on level)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(motherboard, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(motherboard, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(lcd, work on level)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on atomic level)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(lcd, work on atomic level)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on atomic level)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on molecular level)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(lcd, work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lcd, work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lcd, work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lcd, work on molecular level)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lcd, work on atomic level)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lcd, work on molecular level)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lcd, work on molecular level)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lcd, work on level)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(application, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(function, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(technology, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(motherboard, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(application, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(function, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lcd, work on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(technology, work)