leadership: has physical part style

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part style 1.00
change style 0.87
has physical part left 0.81
has physical part tool 0.77
has physical part layer 0.77
has physical part holes 0.76
has physical part float 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ability, has physical part float) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(leadership, has physical part style)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ability, has physical part float)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ability, has physical part float)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(speaker, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ability, has physical part float) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(leadership, has physical part style)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(speaker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(speaker, has physical part holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(leadership, has physical part style)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has physical part style)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(leadership, has physical part style)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ability, has physical part float)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(speaker, has physical part holes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(leadership, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ability, has physical part float)