led: be more efficient than lights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, part
Weight: 0.56
, light source
Weight: 0.53
, lamp
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigger
Weight: 0.30
, stem
Weight: 0.30
, ending
Weight: 0.30
, third
Weight: 0.30
, in
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient than lights 1.00
light more efficient 0.94
be more efficient than incandescent lights 0.93
light efficient 0.90
be more efficient than incandescent 0.89
be better than light bulbs 0.85
be better than conventional light bulbs 0.85
be better than conventional bulbs 0.83
be better than bulbs 0.83
be much brighter than green leds 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than lights)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(led, light more efficient)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(led, light more efficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than incandescent lights)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(led, light more efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(led, be better than conventional light bulbs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(led, light more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient than lights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient than lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient than lights)