legume: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.60
, food
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soybean
Weight: 0.67
, lentil
Weight: 0.65
, pea
Weight: 0.63
, alfalfa
Weight: 0.62
, clover
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality evil 0.78
be bad on whole30 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(legume, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(legume, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(legume, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(legume, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(legume, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(legume, has quality evil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality evil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality evil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(legume, has quality evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(legume, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)