legume: be bad on whole30

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.60
, food
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soybean
Weight: 0.67
, lentil
Weight: 0.65
, pea
Weight: 0.63
, alfalfa
Weight: 0.62
, clover
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad on whole30 1.00
be considered bad 0.85
has quality bad 0.85
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, be bad on whole30)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(legume, be bad on whole30)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(legume, be considered bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(legume, be considered bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(legume, be considered bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(legume, be considered bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(legume, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(legume, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(legume, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(legume, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, be bad on whole30)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(legume, be bad on whole30) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)