lemonade: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.67
, drink
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.62
, flavor
Weight: 0.57
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.56
Siblings soda
Weight: 0.36
, cider
Weight: 0.36
, apple juice
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, juice
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
has quality change 0.86
be good on day 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lemonade, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lemonade, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(juice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lemonade, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lemonade, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(juice, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lemonade, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(lemonade, has quality better)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lemonade, has quality better)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lemonade, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(lemonade, has quality change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lemonade, has quality change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lemonade, has quality change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lemonade, be good on day)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lemonade, be good on day)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lemonade, be good on day)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, be good on day)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lemonade, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(juice, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lemonade, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)